Online Slots and Casino Bill Tracker: 2026 State by State

The Revenue Case, State by State

These are the 2025 revenue figures lawmakers cite most often when they argue for legalization. They show a mature, growing industry concentrated in a handful of states, which is exactly what fuels the cross-border envy driving new bills.

States Where Online Slots Are Legal and Live

These states have enacted laws that authorize regulated real-money online casino gaming, which includes online slots. Each links to its dedicated state guide. Read together, they form a natural laboratory: they show how tax rates, licensing structures and market sizes actually play out once online slots go live, which is exactly the evidence lawmakers in undecided states argue over.

Legal and live New Jersey, legalized 2013

New Jersey authorized internet gaming under a 2013 law signed by Gov. Chris Christie, and the market went live in November 2013. It is the most influential online casino market in the country and the template most other states study. New Jersey ties every online casino to an Atlantic City land-based license holder, and each of those casinos may partner with multiple online brands, which is why the state supports one of the deepest fields of operators in the nation, with dozens of slots and table-game sites competing for players. The most important New Jersey development in years came in 2025, when the state raised its online gambling tax. For more than a decade New Jersey taxed online casino gross gaming revenue at 15 percent. Gov. Phil Murphy's February 2025 budget proposed lifting the rate on internet gaming, sports betting and fantasy sports all the way to 25 percent. After operators pushed back, lawmakers settled on a compromise flat rate of 19.75 percent, enacted through A5803 and effective July 1, 2025. The increase applies to online casino and online sports betting alike, and it turned New Jersey from one of the lowest-taxed iGaming states into a mid-range one nearly overnight. In 2025 the state's internet gaming revenue climbed about 22 percent to roughly 2.91 billion dollars, and online play now out-earns Atlantic City's brick-and-mortar floors. New Jersey is the clearest proof that a large, competitive, multi-operator online casino market can coexist with a land-based industry rather than destroy it. See the

New Jersey slots guide

.

Legal and live Delaware, legalized 2012

Delaware passed the Gaming Competitiveness Act in 2012 and launched online casino games in late 2013, making it one of the first states in the nation to offer internet slots and table games. Delaware runs the narrowest of the early models. The market operates through the Delaware Lottery in partnership with the state's three casinos, on a revenue-share basis rather than an open, competitive-tax structure, which keeps the field small and the numbers modest compared with larger neighbors. In late 2023 the state moved its online platform to a new provider, a transition that reshaped the player experience. Delaware matters less for its size than for what it demonstrates, that a small state can run a lottery-centered online casino for more than a decade without controversy, and that a tightly limited market trades competition and choice for simplicity and control. See the

Delaware slots guide

.

Legal and live Pennsylvania, legalized 2017

Pennsylvania legalized online casino gaming as part of a sweeping gambling expansion signed in 2017, and games went live in July 2019. It has since grown into the largest iGaming market in the country by revenue, reaching roughly 3.46 billion dollars in 2025, a gain of nearly 28 percent year over year. Pennsylvania ties online licenses to its land-based casinos and allows a broad field of brands, producing a deep and competitive market. Its defining feature is tax. Pennsylvania taxes online slots at an effective rate near 54 percent, one of the highest in the world, while online table games are taxed at about 16 percent. Operators and analysts cite the 54 percent slots rate constantly in other states as the cautionary example of how high is too high, arguing it squeezes promotions and margins. Yet Pennsylvania's revenue keeps climbing, which supporters of high rates cite right back as proof that a big, well-run market can absorb heavy taxation. That tension, between the state that taxes online slots the hardest and the market that nonetheless grew the biggest, sits at the center of nearly every tax-rate debate elsewhere. See the

Pennsylvania slots guide

.

Legal and live West Virginia, legalized 2019

West Virginia passed the Lottery Interactive Wagering Act in 2019, and online casinos launched in July 2020. The market is tied to the state's five commercial casinos and taxes online casino revenue at 15 percent, among the friendlier rates in the country. Though modest in absolute size, West Virginia's online casinos have grown steadily and closed a record fiscal year with revenue reported around 439 million dollars, with monthly figures in 2026 running sharply higher year over year. That growth has drawn the attention of budget writers. In the 2026 session, West Virginia lawmakers floated raising the iGaming tax, with proposals discussed in the 15 to 25 percent range, part of a broader look at gaming tax increases. As of mid-2026 the 15 percent rate still stood, but West Virginia is a live example of how quickly a legal state can revisit the tax bargain once a market matures. See the

West Virginia slots guide

.

Legal and live Michigan, legalized 2019

Michigan enacted the Lawful Internet Gaming Act in late 2019, and online casinos launched in January 2021. Michigan has grown into one of the top revenue states, generating roughly 3.1 billion dollars in online casino receipts in 2025, up about 26.5 percent. Michigan's structure is notable for blending commercial and tribal operators: Detroit's three commercial casinos and the state's federally recognized tribes each may field online brands, which produced a broad, competitive market from the start. Michigan taxes iGaming on a graduated scale that runs from 20 percent on the lowest revenue tier up to 28 percent on the highest, a middle path between New Jersey's flat rate and Pennsylvania's heavy slots levy. In 2025 and 2026 Gov. Gretchen Whitmer proposed raising the iGaming and online sports betting tax rates to help close budget gaps, echoing the New Jersey move, though the increases faced resistance from operators. Michigan is the market neighboring Ohio and Indiana lawmakers point to most often, arguing that Michigan's tax haul represents money their own residents are sending across the state line. See the

Michigan slots guide

.

Legal and live Connecticut, legalized 2021

Connecticut authorized online casino gaming in 2021 through an expansion of its tribal gaming compacts with the Mashantucket Pequot and Mohegan tribes, paired with the Connecticut Lottery. Games launched in October 2021. By design the market is limited to a small number of operators, essentially the two tribal partners and their online brands, so Connecticut players see far less choice than New Jersey or Michigan players do. Connecticut launched with an 18 percent tax on online casino revenue, a rate written to rise over time; reporting indicates it is scheduled to step up to 20 percent in October 2026. Connecticut shows how states with strong tribal-gaming frameworks tend to route online play through existing compacts rather than open commercial licensing, a model Maine would later echo. See the

Connecticut slots guide

.

Legal and live Rhode Island, legalized 2023

Rhode Island became the seventh state to legalize when it passed legislation in 2023 granting Bally's an exclusive online casino license. The market launched in March 2024 and remains the smallest legal iGaming state and the only one built around a single operator. Rhode Island's tax structure is also the most aggressive in the country: the state takes roughly 61 percent of online slots revenue and about 15 percent of online table-game revenue, reflecting the same lopsided split Rhode Island uses across its state-run gaming. In 2026 Bally's was reported to be pursuing a second online betting license in the state on the sports side. Rhode Island is the clearest test of the single-operator, high-tax model, and its modest size shows the tradeoff, less competition and choice in exchange for tight state control and a large public revenue share. See the

Rhode Island slots guide

.

Poker only Nevada, online poker only

Nevada is a special case. The state authorized online poker years ago and remains part of the Multi-State Internet Gaming Agreement that lets licensed poker sites share player pools across state lines, but it has never legalized online slots or house-banked online table games. For a state synonymous with casinos, Nevada's brick-and-mortar Strip and downtown operators have shown little appetite for online slots that might compete with the casino floor, so the state sits outside the iGaming map for everything except poker. Nevada also moved against sweepstakes casinos in the 2025 to 2026 window. Nevada is a reminder that a huge land-based casino industry can be a reason a state does not legalize online slots, not a reason it does. See the

Nevada slots guide

and our multi-state agreements guide.

States With Active or Pending iGaming Bills

The following states saw real online casino legislation during the 2025 or 2026 sessions and remain live possibilities in the near term. These are the races to watch, and each carries its own mix of bill numbers, sponsors, tax proposals and obstacles.

Dead for 2026 New York: closest yet, but dead again for 2026

New York is the market operators watch most closely, because a yes in Albany would reshape the Northeast and pressure every neighboring state. State Sen. Joseph Addabbo Jr., the architect of New York's mobile sports betting law, again carried the online casino effort in 2026 with Senate Bill S2614, paired with an Assembly companion reported as A5922. The proposal set a tax of 30.5 percent on gross gaming revenue and required roughly 150 million dollars in one-time licensing fees from operators, with money earmarked for education and related programs. It would have legalized online slots, blackjack, baccarat, roulette, live dealer games and scratch cards. The obstacle was not the legislature so much as the governor. Gov. Kathy Hochul left iGaming out of her executive budget, as she has in prior years, and never endorsed the bill. Without the governor's backing, and with the legislative session ending in early June, Addabbo acknowledged the measure would not advance and set it aside before adjournment. The bill was never formally vetoed; it simply died on the vine for lack of executive support and time. Addabbo has signaled he will return in 2027, and the decisive question is whether Hochul's office ever folds iGaming into a future budget. Status: dead for 2026, expected to be reintroduced in 2027. See the

New York slots guide

.

In committee Illinois: fourth straight try, still a long road

Illinois is frequently named among the most likely next states to legalize, in part because analysts have estimated a regulated market could generate figures approaching or exceeding several hundred million dollars a year in tax. Rep. Edgar Gonzalez Jr. reintroduced his Internet Gaming Act in February 2026 as House Bill 4797, marking at least the fourth consecutive year the state has taken up online casino legislation. The bill proposes a 25 percent tax on adjusted gross online gaming revenue and would let each of the state's roughly 17 land-based casinos operate up to three online skins, for a theoretical maximum near 51 platforms. It legalizes online slots, table games, live dealer products and poker for players 21 and older. Illinois wrote labor politics directly into the text. The bill would bar an online gaming license for any organization that has cut its workforce by 25 percent or more since late February 2020, a provision aimed squarely at answering casino-union fears about job losses. Even so, the measure faces a long road. Casino labor unions and some existing operators remain wary that online play cannibalizes brick-and-mortar jobs, and reporting through mid-2026 described the bill as essentially identical to the version that stalled in 2025. Most observers now see 2027 as the realistic target. Status: introduced, in committee, prospects uncertain. See the

Illinois slots guide

.

Withdrawn for 2026 Maryland: a fourth straight attempt, withdrawn again

Maryland has become the clearest example of a state that keeps trying and keeps falling short. State Sen. Ron Watson, a Democrat from Prince George's County, led the 2026 effort with a two-bill approach, at least his fourth consecutive attempt after proposals in 2023, 2024 and 2025. Senate Bill 761 would have placed online casino legalization before voters as a referendum on the November 2026 general-election ballot, and Senate Bill 885 would have built the regulatory framework for internet gaming and online bingo if voters approved. Prior Maryland drafts floated high tax rates on slots, with lower rates discussed for live dealer play. The 2026 effort unraveled quickly. The Budget and Taxation Committee hearing on the referendum bill was canceled in mid-March, and Watson withdrew SB 761 on March 13. The framework bill received its own hearing but lost any realistic path once the referendum measure was gone, and it failed to advance before Maryland's Crossover Day deadline on March 23. Because Maryland requires a constitutional referendum to expand gambling, the calendar and the two-thirds politics of putting a question on the ballot make iGaming especially hard there. A separate 2026 effort to ban sweepstakes casinos remained alive even after the legalization bills died. Status: withdrawn and dead for 2026. See the

Maryland slots guide

.

Advancing slowly Virginia: advancing, but on a deliberate two-year track

Virginia revived its iGaming push in 2026. Del. Marcus Simon carried House Bill 161, with a Senate companion reported as Senate Bill 118, to let licensed casino operators offer online slots and table games, and reporting indicated poker as well. Draft tax rates centered near 20 percent of adjusted gross revenue, and each of Virginia's land-based casinos would be allowed a limited number of online brands. The bills also added responsible-gambling and consumer-protection language as they moved through committee. The important wrinkle is procedural rather than political. Amendments require the measure to pass in both the 2026 and 2027 sessions before it can take effect, a re-enactment clause that deliberately slows the process. That means even in the best case, a launch could not happen until 2028. The bills advanced but were essentially set on a two-year timer rather than passed outright. The real test will be the 2027 vote, when a second passage would lock in the framework. Status: advanced, on a multi-year re-enactment track, no launch before 2028. See the

Virginia slots guide

.

No consensus Ohio: multiple competing bills, no consensus

Ohio has openly coveted the tax receipts flowing to neighboring Michigan, and it has produced more iGaming bills than almost any other state, which is part of its problem. Rather than one clean vehicle, Ohio lawmakers floated several competing proposals with sharply different terms. House Bill 298 would authorize online casino gaming for the state's 11 existing casinos and racinos at a proposed 28 percent tax. On the Senate side, Senate Bill 197 called for a much steeper structure, a 50 million dollar license fee and a tax reported in the 36 to 40 percent range depending on the operator's relationship to a brick-and-mortar casino, while a separate measure, reported as Senate Bill 312, floated a far lower 15 percent rate. That spread, from 15 percent to 40 percent across three bills, shows how far apart Ohio lawmakers remain on the core tax question. Senate Bill 197 drew a marathon committee hearing at which more than 40 people testified, and the Select Committee on Gaming took no vote afterward. None of the bills passed either chamber as of mid-2026. Ohio has the casino footprint and the neighbor-envy motivation to legalize, but until lawmakers converge on a single tax and licensing model, the issue stays stuck. Status: multiple bills in committee, hearings held, no consensus. See the

Ohio slots guide

.

Shelved for 2026 Indiana: iGaming shelved, sweepstakes banned instead

Indiana has flirted with online casinos for several years without closing the deal. A 2025 online casino bill died in committee amid concerns about cannibalizing revenue at the state's land-based casinos, and lawmakers entered 2026 with the iGaming question again on the table. Rather than advance it, the legislature set full online casino gaming aside for the year and turned its attention elsewhere. Indiana instead enacted a law prohibiting online sweepstakes casinos in 2026, and separately pursued land-based gaming measures. Specific 2026 iGaming bill numbers reported in secondary sources varied, so treat any single number with caution and confirm against the Indiana General Assembly's site. Indiana is widely expected to revisit iGaming in 2027, given its large casino industry and the Midwest revenue competition. Status: iGaming shelved for 2026, sweepstakes banned. See the

Indiana slots guide

.

In committee Massachusetts: under committee review

Massachusetts had online casino legislation under committee review during the 2025 to 2026 session, tracked as House Bill 4431, which would both regulate online casinos and ban unlicensed sweepstakes operators in the same measure. The state legalized sports betting in 2023 and its lawmakers have studied iGaming closely, but the bill had not advanced to a floor vote as of mid-2026. Massachusetts is a plausible medium-term candidate given its regulated sports betting market and casino industry, but the pairing of legalization with a sweepstakes ban shows how cautious the politics remain. Status: in committee. See the

Massachusetts slots guide

.

Studied, no bill North Carolina: studied, but sidestepped for now

North Carolina is a newer name in the conversation. After launching mobile sports betting in March 2024, the state saw interest in exploring online casino authority, and a study effort weighed the idea heading into 2026. So far, though, North Carolina has sidestepped full iGaming. Reporting indicates lawmakers shifted focus toward digital instant lottery products, which have grown quickly, rather than authorizing online casino games, and no iCasino bill advanced in 2026. Several legislators have signaled interest in revisiting the question, with 2027 floated as a more realistic window. North Carolina is worth watching precisely because it fits the profile of a sports-betting state that could graduate to online casinos, but it is not there yet. Status: studied, no bill advanced, possible 2027 revival. See the

North Carolina slots guide

.

Key Legislative Dates at a Glance

This chronological timeline pulls the enabling laws, launches and the landmark 2025 tax change into one view, so you can see how slowly the legal map has actually expanded.

The Sweepstakes-Casino Legislative Fight of 2025 and 2026

The most active battleground in online gambling law right now is not full iGaming legalization. It is the fight over sweepstakes casinos, sometimes called social casinos. These sites offer slot-style and table games under a dual-currency system, typically a free virtual currency for play and a second promotional currency that can be redeemed for cash or prizes. Operators argue this structure keeps them outside the legal definition of gambling. A growing number of states, regulators and attorneys general reject that argument and say the sites are unlicensed online casinos in all but name. By 2026 the model had grown into an industry estimated in the billions of dollars in annual revenue, and the legislative backlash accelerated into the single most productive area of gambling lawmaking. As of mid-2026, states reported to have passed explicit statutory bans during the 2025 and 2026 sessions include Montana, Connecticut, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, Louisiana, Maine, Indiana, Oklahoma, California and Tennessee, with additional states pursuing bans or enforcement. A few of the landmark measures:

• Montana was the first mover. Senate Bill 555 was signed in May 2025 and took effect Oct. 1, 2025, making Montana the first state with an explicit statutory ban.
• Connecticut followed quickly. Public Act 25-112, signed by Gov. Ned Lamont, classified operating a sweepstakes casino as a felony offense, effective Oct. 1, 2025.
• New York enacted one of the most aggressive bans in the spring of 2026, making it a felony to operate or promote sweepstakes casino platforms aimed at New York residents, with a short compliance window after the governor’s signature.
• Louisiana passed two measures in 2026. House Bill 883 amended the state’s computer-wagering statute to cover dual-currency games, and House Bill 53 expanded the organized-crime statute so operators can face racketeering charges carrying penalties reported up to 50 years. Both were set to take effect Aug. 1, 2026.
• Additional states including Indiana, Maine, Nevada, Oklahoma, California and Tennessee enacted or advanced bans, while states such as Iowa and Maryland pursued enforcement or separate prohibition bills.

Beyond outright bans, several states and enforcement bodies targeted the supply chain, pressuring the payment processors, game studios and platform providers that keep sweepstakes sites running, which can be more effective than chasing offshore operators directly. The sweepstakes fight matters for the broader legalization debate in two ways. First, it hardens the line between licensed and unlicensed online play and gives regulators a template for going after operators outside their systems. Second, it complicates the politics of full iGaming. Some lawmakers argue that the popularity of sweepstakes sites proves untapped demand for regulated online casinos and that legalization would channel that demand into a taxed, supervised market. Others argue the opposite, that the harms surfaced by sweepstakes sites are a reason to slow down all online gambling expansion. Several 2026 iGaming bills, including the Massachusetts and Maryland measures, pair legalization or a framework with an explicit sweepstakes ban, trying to capture both arguments at once. For more on how these sites work and where they stand, see our sweepstakes casinos guide.

The 2026 Session in Review

If 2018 through 2022 was the sports betting era, 2026 confirmed that online casino expansion is moving on a much slower and more contested track. Maine's early-2026 legalization was the year's one clear win for expansion, and even that came through a tribal-exclusivity route rather than the commercial model most operators prefer, and without a launch by late summer. Everywhere else, the story was delay. New York, the biggest prize, died again without executive support. Maryland was withdrawn for a fourth straight year. Indiana and North Carolina set the issue aside, and Wyoming's lawmakers began drafting language to prohibit online gaming more firmly rather than legalize it. Illinois, Ohio, Massachusetts and Virginia kept their bills alive but pushed the realistic timeline to 2027 or beyond. The most consequential change of the year happened inside a state that was already legal. New Jersey's decision to raise its online gambling tax from 15 percent to 19.75 percent, following Pennsylvania's long-standing high rates and preceding tax-hike proposals in Michigan and West Virginia, marked the start of a new phase. The early legal states are no longer just defending their markets; they are optimizing the revenue from them. That trend toward higher taxes in mature markets is now part of the calculus every undecided state weighs, because it changes the revenue projections that make the fiscal case. The clearest momentum outside the legal states ran in the opposite direction from legalization. The sweepstakes-casino crackdown produced more enacted laws in 2025 and 2026 than full iGaming legalization did, with felony-level bans in states including Montana, Connecticut, New York and Louisiana and enforcement pushes in many others. That tells you where legislative energy actually went. Lawmakers found it far easier to agree on restricting an unregulated product than on authorizing a new regulated one. Whether that restrictive energy eventually converts into support for taxed, licensed online casinos, on the theory that demand should be captured rather than merely banned, is the central open question heading into 2027.

Frequently Asked Questions